Ressources dossier

Agroecology

AI: an ally for the agroecological transition? AI governance for agriculture

AI is transforming agriculture by improving efficiency and sustainability, but we must rigorously manage the risks it creates. In particular, reflection must focus on the accessibility of the technology and its usefulness for farmers.

Published on 12 February 2026

This is an undeniable opportunity: in agriculture and elsewhere, AI can give everyone access to the knowledge embedded in data. Farmers can use AI to better understand the complex regulations governing their profession, improve their practices and develop new techniques. Modern agricultural machinery generates vast amounts of data, but the latter is often captured by manufacturers (which are frequently foreign owned). A high risk of losing sovereignty over agricultural data exists, but farmers do not always fully understand the implications of sharing this information.

Data governance

For research purposes, farmers may entrust their data to third parties such as INRAE. ‘We comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and  compile information over a sufficiently large geographical area so that individual data is made anonymous within a broader dataset,’ explains Hadi Quesneville, INRAE’s Chief Data Officer. However, even within public research, a clearer definition is needed of how the data of farmers is used. ‘INRAE has established a governance framework for the ethical and secure use of research data and AI. Moreover, awareness-raising, training and acculturation among farmers is essential to fostering an informed use of data and AI,’ adds Hadi Quesneville.

INRAE is a partner in the report published in February by the Blue Shift Institute, which proposes early-stage strategic solutions to support organisations.

32 countries have passed at least one AI-related law (2023 data)

2023 : Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (Canada)

2024 : European Artificial Intelligence Act
Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence (South Korea)

Source: Blue Shift report

Increasing the agency of farmers

The issues of responsibility and opacity sometimes generated by AI is also problematic. Automatic decision-making raises the issue of liability: in the event of an algorithmic error that results in an overdiagnosis or inappropriate recommendation, legal responsibility remains unclear. The lack of transparency around algorithmic ‘black boxes’ undermines user trust and can deter farmers from engaging with new technology.

The FAO Innovation Office brought these reflections on AI in agriculture to the global stage by organising a multi-stakeholder meeting in April 2025. An INRAE delegation was among the 90 researchers, consultants, representatives of the digital industry, investors and institutional stakeholders that met to discuss the issues. Three days of productive exchanges are expected to lead to a roadmap in the near future.
 

 

According to Isabelle Piot-Lepetit, an INRAE researcher at the MoISAjoint research unit, the adoption of AI varies depending on farmer profiles, which can be broadly categorised as follows: innovators, who develop solutions themselves; followers, who wait for their peers to test innovation before adopting them; and the hesitant, who lacks time, training and support. The cost of AI is also  a factor. Paradoxically, the technology offers highly accessible entry points for small-scale farmers and livestock producers —via smartphones, for example— but in the future may only be an option for large farms that can bear the high costs of AI infrastructure like sensors, software and training.

Across all types of farming, support for farmers in their adoption of AI appears to be a determining factor.

Agricultural advisory services therefore find themselves at the heart of these new issues. ‘AI could transform the role of agricultural advisers without replacing them. In fact, access to large volumes of data can equip advisers with knowledge and help them  counter the increasing spread of misinformation among farmers,’ notes INRAE researcher Pierre Labarthe (Agir joint research unit), while emphasising the still largely theoretical nature of these observations and the need for empirical research to better understand the impact of AI on agriculture.

For these new technological uses, living labs —participatory and innovative research laboratories— have an important role to play by involving farmers, researchers, citizens, companies and public authorities in the co-creation of solutions tailored to the complex challenges of the agricultural sector. Initiatives such as the INRAE-led Occitanum programme to mobilise digital technology for the agroecological transition in the Occitanie region are a good illustration.

AI, an ally for the agroecological transition?

AI emerges as a technology that is useful for the ecological transition

At first glance, agroecology and AI may appear to be fundamentally at odds. Yet this is precisely where the paradox lies: AI emerges as a technology that is useful for the ecological transition.

Reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture

By vastly enhancing farmers’ forecasting and decision-making capabilities, AI allows us to use natural resources more sustainably and better understand environmental trade-offs. ‘Agroecology is highly data-intensive and relies on tools capable of managing this complexity, which is exactly what AI offers,’ believes Xavier Reboud, an ecologist and special advisor to INRAE’s Scientific Directorate of Agriculture on the interface between agroecology, technology and digital tools. ‘AI offers the potential of being a virtuous technology, capable of guiding our choices towards new production systems, new uses and new forms of governance, for sustainable development that respects planetary boundaries,’ add INRAE researchers Sophie Schbath (MaIAGE unit) and Frédérick Garcia (MIAT unit).

Asking the right questions 

Ethical considerations steering AI require that it be used in a way that results in solutions for farmers that are compatible with agroecology. However, this ethical commitment may run up against what is economically viable: what is the market? What is the business model and the return on investment? No AI is inherently good, neutral, balanced or objective. When it comes to agroecology, we must steer AI with the right questions from the outset. If we want to manage a pest outbreak, for example, we must ask whether there aren’t naturally occurring beneficial forces already present in the threatened environment. AI can help provide the answer to this question,’ emphasises Xavier Reboud.

‘When it comes to agroecology, we must steer AI with the right questions from the outset.’
Xavier Reboud

Resource-intensive AI systems 

Another paradox is that, while in theory AI can improve resource management, its large-scale rollout and the computing and equipment needed to collect and process training data rapidly increases the consumption of energy, water and rare metals. The environmental impacts of this include resource depletion, greenhouse gas emissions and diffuse pollution. ‘Initial studies estimate that global AI-related water consumption in 2027 will equal half of the United Kingdom’s water consumption,’ note Sophie Schbath and Frédérick Garcia.

Public AI research must therefore focus on the design of frugal systems, as recommended by the French Economic, Social and Environmental Council (ESEC). This is the approach taken by the SHARP project of the AI PEPR programme, which designs, analyses and rolls out intrinsically effective models (neural or otherwise) capable of achieving the versatility and performance of the best existing models with only a tiny fraction of the resources. In February 2025, the Chinese company DeepSeek took people by surprise when it announced two AI models that consume ten times less electricity than performance-equivalent alternatives. But does a more energy-efficient tool not risk being used more extensively, thereby triggering a rebound effect?

All these factors must be assessed, quantified and taken into account to make the best possible use of AI in agroecology, drawing in particular on the quality assessments and life-cycle analyses used in digital innovation.

In conclusion

The coming years will be decisive in defining the roadmap for AI to support productive and sustainable agriculture. As Carole Caranta, Deputy Director General of Science and Innovation at INRAE, confirms: ‘AI is clearly a strategic lever for enabling agriculture to meet the major challenges of tomorrow such as the agroecological transition and adaptation to climate change. As a catalyst of scientific knowledge across all fields of agronomic research, it is also a source of actionable solutions for all farmers, who can anticipate health and climate risks, optimise the use of production and management tools, and be relieved of repetitive tasks.’ 

  • Anne-Lise Carlo

    Author / Translated by Emma Norton and AI

  • Véronique Bellon-Maurel, Jean-Pierre Chanet, Claire Rogel-Gaillard

    Scientific pilots