Biodiversity 3 min

Domestication history of apricots retraced through genomics

PRESS RELEASE - INRAE, the universities of Bordeaux and Paris-Saclay, and the CNRS have analysed the entire genome sequence of more than 900 cultivated and related wild apricot trees from different geographic locations. The findings have contributed to our knowledge of adaptation processes and allowed scientists to identify the important genomic sections for breeding and growing fruit trees. Published in the 25 June 2021 issue of Nature Communications, this study retraces the domestication events, which go back two to three thousand years, of apricots that are cultivated today in Europe and China. Despite their phenotypic similarities, these apricots have originated from distinct wild populations in central Asia following independent routes to domestication. Life cycle, fruit quality and disease resistance are all traits associated with the genes found to have been under human selection in these fruit trees.

Published on 30 June 2021

illustration Domestication history of apricots retraced through genomics
© Pixabay

Over the course of the domestication of fruit trees, human selection has affected reproductive and vegetative traits (such as the flowering period), fruit features (for example size, acidity, firmness and flavour), as well as crop response to biotic stress (e.g. bacteria and pests) and abiotic stress (e.g. drought and cold weather). Human selection, being recent and strong, has left footprints in genomes that are easier to detect than those typically left by natural selection.

Apricots are good models for identifying the genes that have been under selection during domestication and for studying the adaptation processes of fruit trees. Indeed, apricots have a small genome (~220 Mb[1], i.e. less than twice that of thale cress, Arabidopsis thaliana, and 70 times smaller than that of wheat), and wild populations that share a common ancestor with cultivated apricots are available. To reconstruct the history of their domestication, INRAE, the universities of Bordeaux and Paris-Saclay, and the CNRS assembled four high-quality genomes[2] from the domesticated species and its relatives and analysed the sequences of more than 900 accessions[3]originating from different geographic locations throughout the world.

 

Different domestication events

Prunus armeniaca L. refers to both the wild ancestor of apricots and the common cultivated species. Its natural populations still only occur in central Asia[4]. In addition to cultivated and wild apricots, the researchers also studied four other related Armeniaca species: three endemic to East Asia[5], principally China, and one present in the French and Italian Alps[6].

The study shows that European and Chinese cultivated apricots form two distinct genetic groups that resulted from independent domestication events. Long considered native to China, apricots cultivated in Europe actually come from a wild population from northern central Asia, while apricots cultivated in China were domesticated from a population in southern central Asia. Apricots grown in Europe and China have similar traits (shape and fruit size, tree phenology, etc.), which suggests a converging adaptation over the course of parallel domestication events. This raises the question: does such convergent adaptation occur through similar changes in the same genomic regions?

 

Different regions of the genome impacted

Despite their similarities, human selection targeted different regions of the genome in European versus Chinese cultivated apricots. This means that different genomic modifications can lead to the same adaptive phenotypes. In both groups, the genes affected by human domestication had predicted functions involved in the perennial life cycle, fruit quality and disease resistance. The large size of apricot populations, the long life cycle[7] of perennial cultures, and the subsequent gene flow observed between wild and cultivated populations have allowed domesticated apricots to maintain high genetic diversity and led to relatively low proportions of the genome being affected by selection (0.42% and 0.22% in European and Chinese apricots, respectively).

Compared with annual crops such as maize and rice, the footprints of adaptive events in fruit tree genomes, in response to domestication, are the subject of few studies and poorly understood. The results of this study will help advance knowledge of adaptation processes. Identifying the genomic regions impacted by human selection further provides clues to the biology of selected traits during domestication and targets for fruit tree research and breeding.

 

[1] Millions of base pairs

 

[2] High-quality genome assemblies consist in assembling sequence reads (long and short fragments) with optical maps into longer sequences (contigs or pseudomolecules) in order to obtain one single sequence for each individual chromosome.

 

[3] Accessions: Individuals from samples of vegetatively propagated material, taken at the same time from the same place. There is only one way to identify accessions and each accession represents a sample from a parent tree collected in situ, a cultivar, a lineage or a population.

 

[4] Liu et al., 2019 (DOI: 10.1111/mec.15296); Decroocq et al., 2016 (DOI: 10.1111/mec.13772)

 

[5] P. mume, P. sibirica L., P. mandshurica

 

[6] P. brigantina

 

[7] 40 - 45 years for apricot trees

 

 

Reference

Groppi, A., Liu, S., Cornille, A. et al. Population genomics of apricots unravels domestication history and adaptive events. Nat Commun 12, 3956 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24283-6

PR_Génome-Abricotiers-Final_EN.pdfpdf - 1.10 MB

INRAE Press Office

Scientific contact

Véronique Decroocq Fruit Biology and Pathology research unit (BFP)

Centres

Division

Learn more

Biodiversity

How grapevine downy mildew invaded our vineyards: a look back at its voyage from North America

PRESS RELEASE - Plasmopara viticola, the pathogen responsible for grapevine downy mildew, causes destructive epidemics that can result in major losses for winegrowers. Although the biological determinants and mode of reproduction of the disease are well understood, we know almost nothing about its invasion history. How did this pathogen of North American origin come to invade the world? INRAE scientists have been working in collaboration with Université Paris-Saclay and CNRS to understand the process underlying this spread. Published on 25 March in Current Biology, their findings provide us with some keys to the mystery. A clearer understanding of its history, and hence its evolution, will offer a lever to control this parasite which is the reason for most fungicide treatments applied in vineyards.

25 March 2021

Biodiversity

Large-scale genomics sheds light on the evolutionary history of mutualistic forest-dwelling fungi

PRESS RELEASE - Mutualistic fungi, known as mycorrhizae, play a major role in terrestrial ecosystems because they help plants acquire nutrients. However, how these fungi became symbionts was a mystery until now. Answers to this question have been provided by an international research consortium coordinated by INRAE and the Joint Genome Institute (US Department of Energy) to which the University of Lorraine and CNRS also contributed. The group analysed the genomes of 135 species of forest-dwelling fungi. The study's results clarify how fungi living as decomposers became plant symbionts over the course of evolution. These findings were published on October 12 in Nature Communications.

12 October 2020

Agroecology

INRAE strategy for plant genome editing technologies

Genome editing technologies have become a key tool in plant genetics and breeding and INRA adopts a strategy regarding the use of these technologies for plant research, in a context of societal and regulatory debate. This strategy is in line with the Institute’s values and with its ambition to contribute to environmental, social and economic progress. It takes into account the recommendations made in Opinion 11 of the Joint INRA-CIRAD-IFREMER Ethics Advisory Committee on new plant breeding techniques. The strategy’s six underlying principles were approved by INRA’s Scientific Advisory Board on 19 September 2018.

03 January 2020