Climate change and risks 3 min

Dealing with rising sea levels

On 24 October 2019, the French alliance for research on the environment (AllEnvi) published the results of a foresight study, which had been steered in part by three members of the soon-to-be-established INRAE. This study covered the economic, social and environmental consequences of a rise in sea levels by 2100, along with possible ways to anticipate it. Using eight worldwide scenarios and three territorial focuses, the report provides the keys to anticipating and limiting this phenomenon worldwide – one of the direct effects of climate change – and adapting to it at the territorial scale.

Published on 24 October 2019

illustration Dealing with rising sea levels

The ocean is rising relentlessly and at an increasing rate: +3.5 cm per year over the last decade as compared to +2.7 cm during the preceding one, with climate change driving this quickened pace. According to the latest possible scenarios outlined by the IPCC1, by 2100 the accumulated total could be from + 60 to + 110 cm, due to melting polar ice and mountain glaciers and expanding seawater. The risk is particularly high for the deltas, coastal areas and shorelines that ever increasing numbers of human activity have wrested from the sea for farming, urbanisation, tourism, business, industry and infrastructures. Such coastal areas consist of both ecosystems and fragile lands where communities and economic activities have clustered, often without any overall vision or control over the numerous decisions regarding them. While the current impact of the rise in sea levels is still limited, forecasts portend significant effects on coastlines, habitat, infrastructures, agricultural and tourist activities, ecosystems, and freshwater resources. The increase in extreme weather events also raises concerns about more frequent coastal inundation and flooding into dry inland areas. Over the long-term, the increase in sea levels will force us to rethink both planning in the areas at risk and the safety of the communities involved. In certain situations, consideration will have to be given to moving communities and activities inland away from such hazards, thereby impacting wider areas than just those directly affected by sea level rises.

Already high risks, whatever the scenario considered

The pace of climate change has to slow down if we want to be able to act on the speed and intensity of the rise in sea levels, which supposes strong and coordinated action worldwide. Territorial adaptation depends primarily on local policies. The foresight study’s eight scenarios, divided into three families, made it possible to project the future based on the speed of the sea level rise and the frequency of extreme weather events. They combined those factors, categorised in four levels: moderate, serious, grave or extreme, with different response thresholds such as worldwide governance that may or may not be able to take prompt measures to slow down global warming, and local policies ranging from proactive - via appropriate coastal zone development and/or managing the move inland away from such zones -  to “business as usual”.

Overall, the four scenarios in the “Coastal Adaptation” family are the most virtuous, with a bonus for those two that combine local anticipation with governance that makes it possible to mitigate climate change and, therefore, sea level rises, i.e. “Climate Control” or “Sober and Proactive”. In the three Denial family scenarios, no actions are taken commensurate with the gravity of climate and environmental changes until at least 2050. Public policies then finally change due to a surge in water-rise-related disasters. The longer it takes to get a collective reaction, the greater the risk that social relations will become more fractured under the influence of economic, environmental, and humanitarian crises. The “Fragmented World” family scenario simulates a situation where local, regional and national policies differ and are sometimes contradictory. That leads to uneven dynamics based on the “every man for himself” principle.

Assertive and coordinated public policies at the global level before 2040

Governance is a major driver

These experts concluded that governance is a major driver since without assertive public policies at the global level before 2040, acute or extreme situations could occur. Local adaptation efforts mainly aim at dykes, replenishing barrier beaches, strengthening ecosystems and, when such solutions are not possible, managing a move inland to safer areas. They urged the use of reversible solutions as well as nature-based ones in order to avoid poor adaptation. They highlighted the need for multi-disciplinary research involving all the specialists to understand, foresee and measure this phenomenon and assess its impacts. Such research will also have to provide solutions for bringing about the coastal and urban transition, reducing or mitigating inundation, limiting unequal exposure to risk and managing crisis situations.

1 IPCC  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Visit the AllEnvi website

La mer monte, rapport (172 pages)pdf - 5.95 MBLa mer monte, résumé (8 pages)pdf - 1.20 MB

Nicole Ladettranslated by Sheryl Mellor


Audrey BéthingerProject leaderthe Directorate for Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies (INRAE)

Nicolas de MenthièreCo-leader of the AllEnvi foresight transversal groupthe Directorate for Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies (INRAE)

Olivier MoraCo-leader of the AllEnvi foresight transversal groupthe Directorate for Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies (INRAE)

Denis LacroixCo-leader of the AllEnvi foresight transversal groupIFREMER

the Directorate for Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies